top of page

Virtual Fencing Technology

  • Writer: VAWA
    VAWA
  • Nov 9, 2022
  • 3 min read

Updated: Jun 1

Virtual fencing technology on bull beef
Virtual fencing technology on bull beef

On 2nd June 2026, VAWA released a world-first Code of Ethical Conduct for Virtual Fencing Technology. The Code is a comprehensive framework addressing a significant animal welfare regulatory gap in jurisdictions using virtual fencing technology (VFT) commercially.

As global adoption of virtual fencing technology rapidly expands, VAWA would like the industry to gather and collectively and transparently self-regulate, initially via agreed Critical Safeguarding Standards, which will need to expand over time.


Position

VAWA supports non-aversive training and management of animals. The use of electricity in virtual fencing training, herding and containment is inconsistent with this principle.

VAWA does not support the use of virtual fencing technology (VFT) for active herding nor in-paddock drafting, given the absence of evidence that these uses are safe and do not cause unacceptable, avoidable welfare harm.

VAWA also objects to unsubstantiated green- and welfare- washing claims, such as improved environmental and animal welfare. Such claims require independent research to be established in fact.


VAWA's concerns about VFT include:

Dairy cows contained by a virtual fencing system
Dairy cows contained by a virtual fencing system
  1. the aversive methods of training and management (i.e., electrical shock).

  2. the use of VFT for active herding and in-paddock drafting.

  3. the unknown long-term animal welfare effects, including the impact the lack of evidence of safety, efficacy, and understanding of animal experiences when VFT is deployed across varying farm systems (e.g., dairy to beef; intensive to extensive).of disrupted social nodes.

  4. technology glitches and communications failures that adversely affect animals (e.g., outages from topography, or telecommunication network failures in storms).

  5. injuries and other injurious events (e.g., abrasions, callouses, entanglement).

  6. lack of robust, detailed regulation for the use of VFT, and the complete absence of any meaningful regulation in Aotearoa.


Code of Ethical Conduct for Virtual Fencing Technology

Given the legislative gap regarding VFT, VAWA has published its Code of Ethical Conduct for Virtual Fencing Technology. The Code sets out standards that provide a starting point for safe development, deployment and use of VFT on animals. It ensures animal welfare remains at the forefront of innovative farming practices.


"Animal welfare must be integral to the design, implementation, and use of any new farming technology," said Dr. Helen Beattie, Managing Director of VAWA. "The Code will provide developers and users with standards that ensure animal welfare is a non-negotiable priority."


VAWA engaged with stakeholders across the agriculture and animal welfare sectors, consulted with farmers, developers, animal welfare experts, and regulators to create a comprehensive framework that details best practice.


A key recommendation is that VFT manufacturers set up the Virtual Fencing Manufacturers' Association and begin a self-regulation process that is relevant across many jurisdictions. This would enable transparency for international trade and market access, developers, users and everyone with an interest in VFT. Critical Safeguarding Standards have been selected out of the Code as a starting point for the VFMA to begin self-regulation.



Using electricity on animals

Electrical shock is known to be a significant aversive experience for cattle. The UK’s Animal Welfare Committee recently published an opinion of virtual fences and noted:


“Research should be undertaken to find livestock training methods that could replace the current use of aversive electric shocks. If these new methods are demonstrated to be reliable, electric shock training methods should be rapidly phased out of use on livestock.”


VAWA is pleased that innovation is already underway to develop shock-free virtual fencing.


For other positions and information:

  1. RSPCA Australia

  2. RSPCA New Zealand

  3. UK Animal Welfare Committee - opinion on VFT


    Kellogg Reports

  4. David March: Collars, Costs and Returns: Assessing the Value of Cow Wearables in NZ Pasture Systems

  5. Natasha Cave: Beef on the Brink of a Tech Revolution: Wearables on NZ Hill Country


Other activity

February 2026

  1. RSPCA Animal Welfare Seminar 2026: Animal welfare in the digital age


Title: Virtual Fencing - the good, the bad and the ugly.


Click the image to access the You Tube recording
Click the image to access the You Tube recording

December 2024

  1. Media release announcing the Code of Ethical Conduct development

March & April 2024

  1. Agribusiness published our views in this article on virtual fencing.

  2. RNZ's Country Life linked our Dossier on the bottom of their story, "Golden Bay farmer opposes virtual fencing."




Comments


SPECIAL THANKS 

   
  • Murray Cleverley, MD of Business Class Ltd | business advice 

  • Lauren Perry | website, branding, style & design; lashings of patience

  • Polson Higgs | accountants and patient teachers

  • Multiple veterinarians | moral support, nudges and shoves

  • Many others with various bits and pieces, or masses of advice, support and ideas – thank you!

LET'S CONNECT

 

Veterinarians for Animal Welfare Aotearoa

PO Box 9046

Dunedin 9047

Registered Charity | CC60741

+64 (0) 21 122 6796

  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Twitter

© 2023 Veterinarians for Animal Welfare Aotearoa. 

bottom of page